A neighborhood works to secure itself and its members. It does not require organisations, but they typically do have services.
A society is a lot more loosely linked group of people who live socially together without a typical objective. Societies are nearly exclusively bound together by cash.
Business is what turns a neighborhood into a society.
This is bad in the sense that the member of a society’s goals are mixed and there is no guarantee that an individual has the advantage of the society as a foundation of his goals. Undoubtedly it is quite rare even in individuals who in fact work for the society. So you lose the close mutual assistance of a neighborhood.
This is excellent in a different sense. Because societies can grow to be much bigger. It extends the reach of cooperation, a lot so that we now have a global society. Among my objectives is to help reestablish the community back into to the Worldwide society.
We now have billions of people all working and cohabiting primarily quietly. Without a doubt the huge majority are all doing great for the society. It is in their shared financial interest to do so.
This is the result of business. It is the cash that is paid to businesses that keep them operational. The money is paid for a service or produce.
For business to remain in service it must not charge too much otherwise rivals will remove their organisation with cheaper prices.
They should not charge insufficient otherwise they will not have the ability to pay their staff and their personnel will leave to rivals who pay more.
It is a continuous balancing act, where the owner can only take a lot out for himself before the business will have a hard time to keep either its customers or its staff.
Business pays it employees so they can buy product or services from other businesses. So the cash from one service feeds another through its staff members. It also utilizes services and buys items from other businesses. Businesses also feed other services directly.
One of the substantial actions towards the International market is that of delegation and specialization.
For example, one organisation, a farm, grows the food, a product; a second transportations it to a wholesaler, a service; the wholesaler with substantial storage centers mixes the farms produce with other goods and stores them as long as needed and just as long as they need to, this is another service; The wholesaler then uses another transport supplier to provide a mix of items to lots of various shops; The stores then sell the items to the people and other organisations.
All of these organisations need checking account and payment systems between them. This suggests organisation can specialise and be excellent at one job. This is likewise true of people who work for business. Specialization produces a team that can do even more than an inexperienced employee could since they all have different abilities.
The 2nd globalizing aspect is the mega corporations. Sometimes it becomes more affordable for the shop to own the farm the trucks and the ware homes.
For example Morrison’s in England are an extremely market chain owning many stores selling a wide range of products. However all their food they grow is grown by themselves farms.
This ensures that farmers get a good wage for what they are doing and it means they can manage the food better and have much better understanding of the unpredictability of the weather condition on crops so they can manage bad crops and bumper crops by freezing any surplus food on great years for sale in bad years.
The lorry motorists and organizers are all managed centrally and the ware house might be run by robots. As each action in the process is combined there are less transactions going on therefore smaller sized bank charges. As a combined organisation it only requires one HR department it means there is an economy of scale on administering all these employees.
The last action in the worldwide market is personal and company pensions. People are encouraged to save money for their old age. Most pension funds plans invest their money in the stock market. As it is the best return on your investment.
This suggests these mega companies are normally owned by the pensioners who have invested their cash for many years therefore the owners of the business are no longer personal individuals however indirectly the general public. The money that was siphoned off from the organisation by the owners is now going straight into the publics pocket throughout retirement minus a small commission.
The good result of service is that we have worldwide cooperation.
The bad result is that cooperation is based upon money therefore the relationships are just steady until somebody out completes you, either for your service or your personnel.
In a community all relationships are based on Trust
In a society that structure of trust is not there.
I want to reestablish it. This is one reason Quaker companies did so well because they were run as a community and it is also why cooperatives in general succeed.